data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c289/9c289b06e0c90710a392e7bd40b4940df6017f94" alt="Ghost in the shell 1995 nudity"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4d0c/d4d0cf2b6d40d984b385bb3b486fa3ae343a5dea" alt="ghost in the shell 1995 nudity ghost in the shell 1995 nudity"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60b3b/60b3b91075de228d8250f3df1c2318e297c4b2a8" alt="ghost in the shell 1995 nudity ghost in the shell 1995 nudity"
Her animated appearance, however, is so far removed from accurately resembling a human body that I wasn’t able to view her as anything similar to a human. At around the 1:40-1:50 mark in the movie, Kusanagi strips off her clothing. However, given that this animation is so far from being human-like, I found the warning to be almost comical. Were this animation to be incredibly human-like, I would find this warning to be justified in that seeing “almost humans” committing violent acts or engaging in extreme nudity would be rightfully off-putting for a non-mature audience.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ed4a/2ed4ac3e057aebbbc0fd42e1fc7ef8db1bd8950c" alt="ghost in the shell 1995 nudity ghost in the shell 1995 nudity"
We have talked a lot in class about the uncanny valley, where once something becomes too human-like or too real, we suddenly lose our liking for that particular object. Before delving into scenes in the film itself, however, I thought it was interesting to note the precautionary message that appeared first, warning the audience that the animation was intended for mature audiences due to violence, language and nudity. I decided to hone in on the opening scene of the animation in order to best assist me in explaining my real reaction to the use of animated beings to tell a story with computer-generated effects.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c289/9c289b06e0c90710a392e7bd40b4940df6017f94" alt="Ghost in the shell 1995 nudity"